Comments on: obama’s not qualified?

By: Heather

Heather — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:38:15 +0000

thanks to everyone who’s stopped by!

phyllis – i’m with you, but my problem is, what is a “natural born citizen”or how do you get “naturalized”? it seems like a gray area…

theresa – thanks for the link! i can’t believe it’s STILL coming up and from a senator’s lips! wow. yeah – that “certificate of live” birth is on the last link i have above but does seem a little hokey even to me. anyway – he’s been inaugurated so i’m with you – i wish it would go away – don’t we have more to worry about!?!

By: Girl Japan

Girl Japan — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:16:06 +0000

I am so with you on this Heather = )

By: Theresa

Theresa — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:50:45 +0000

Heather, this might help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOFGbYAfuIs
I wish this silly rumor would go away.

By: Phyllis Kunz

Phyllis Kunz — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:10:42 +0000

This is how I would interpret the Constituion: If Pres. Elect Obama is not a natural
born citizen, then it’s plain and simple, he must step down, no two ways about it.

However, if he is qualified under the 14 th Amendment, then he’s ligit and therefore
the President of the United States.

Phyllis Kunz

By: Heather

Heather — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:05:07 +0000

hi ted! thanks for reading and thanks for the in depth information!

if you don’t mind my asking, if this isn’t in the news media, how do you know about the conference and what was submitted by obama?

i would really love to read where you’re finding this great info so i can stay on top of it also!

thanks again!

By: Ted

Ted — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:21:36 +0000

Obama can’t be POTUS.

Since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress’ count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama’s eligibility issue over to Congress, rendering moot both the Berg and Lightfoot cases, Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama’s failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg’s request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.

Checkmate! (WHERE IS THE NEWS MEDIA?)